On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

July 24th, 2008

Medpedia or Knol, doc?

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 7:05 am

Categories: Aging, Consumer Information, Ethics, General, Home Health Care, Internet, Mental Health, Sports Medicine, Wellness

Tags: Google Inc., Knol, Medpedia, Wiki, Professional Development, Vertical Industries, Benefits, Healthcare, Online Communications, Career

Anonymous prestige or money and fame?

That’s the choice doctors who write face today as Medpedia approaches its launch date and Google announces the launch of Knol.

Medpedia logoMedpedia is a joint-venture among leading medical schools which will collect data from those institutions in hopes of building an authoritative online health guide.

No one is getting paid, and no one is getting bylines. But there will be peer review, and a global search for content.

Medpedia says it is bringing the Wikipedia model to health, but it’s really bringing the medical peer review model to the world of wikis.

Why support it? For institutional benefits, which can lead to career advancement. As the Chronicle of Higher Education notes the standards are opaque and there is the risk of hidden agendas. Just like on any other campus.

Knol logoOr you can go to Knol.

The Google blog notes that the Knol model is far more transparent. Authors’ names are published, but others can suggest changes which may be accepted – Google calls this moderated collaboration.

There is also a business model. Authors can take Google ads on their pages and get a cut of the revenue.

But what happens when multiple authors try to own articles on a subject where they strongly disagree? And will organizations come to control Knol — Google is already taking contributions from at least one magazine.

Then there is a question often asked at this site. Will people write for Knol with an aim toward traffic or accuracy? Will doctors whose work is rejected by the profession use Knol to boost their unorthodox views?

The ultimate question is for you. Who will you trust? Someone who signs their articles, and may lack authority, or one who doesn’t, but who claims to be an authority?

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist since 1978, and has covered technology since 1982. He launched the Interactive Age Daily, the first daily coverage of the Internet to launch with a magazine, in September 1994. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to ZDNet Healthcare via Email alerts or RSS.

Talkback

Add your opinion

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here