On TV.com: TOP 10 Shows CANCELED Too Soon
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

August 15th, 2008

Cornyn illustrates U.S. health policy divide

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 8:11 am

Categories: Curioisities, General, Government, U.S.

Tags: Health Care, Cornyn, Doctors, Vertical Industries, Benefits, Healthcare, Enterprise Software, Software, Human Resources, Dana Blankenhorn

John Cornyn from his web siteSen. John Cornyn of Texas made some remarks recently that do a good job of illustrating how far apart the political poles are on health care.

And how easily they might be brought together.

He called his state a model for the nation. He based this on the passage of tort reform, which limited malpractice damages and, he said, increased the supply of doctors in the state.

This shocked the editors of the Houston Chronicle, who cited the June report of The Commonwealth Fund ranking the state 46th in childrens’ healthcare, and 50th in terms of access to care.

But I do not doubt Cornyn’s sincerity. If you’re practicing medicine, or you need top-quality care, Texas is top-notch. The Texas Medical Center may be the best center for acute care in the nation. Doctors’ conditions are improving.

Cornyn’s comments are often reflected right here, where readers praise America’s private health system, blaming its problems on lawyers, the government, or scary advocates like The Commonwealth Fund, which is branded a liberal front.

The American middle class has been divided by the events of this last 30 years into two parts, those who are struggling and those who are well-off.

But most of us don’t know which side we’re on.

Median family income in the U.S. is roughly $48,000 but I often hear TV pundits claim that incomes of up to $200,000 are “middle class.”

The political fact is that millions of people in the low-middle class identify politically with those who are wealthier. This was illustrated by the failed campaign of John Edwards, whose voters actually skewed wealthy even while his message skewed toward those who were not wealthy.

It’s just not true, in modern America, that we vote our economic interest. Some of us do. Many of us don’t, preferring to vote the interests of those we identify with.

As I noted earlier this week, in discussing John McCain’s support among elderly voters, this should hold the roots of compromise in our health care debate. But only if we start being politically honest with ourselves about our real economic situations.

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist since 1978, and has covered technology since 1982. He launched the Interactive Age Daily, the first daily coverage of the Internet to launch with a magazine, in September 1994. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to ZDNet Healthcare via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 7 Talkback(s)
Sadly, you're correct . . .
Texas Repubs, for the most part are nut-cases. It matters little that their backward and uneducated public statements paint the whole state as screwed-up as they are. Specifically, two are the Governo... (Read the rest)
Posted by: pikeman666@... Posted on: 06/29/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
There He Goes Again  Rotkapchen | 08/15/08
The Texas Republican Party...  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 08/15/08
Sadly, you're correct . . .  pikeman666@... | 06/29/09
Voting our economic interest  frgough | 08/15/08
No it isn't...  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 08/15/08
Problem of language.  carlino | 08/15/08
So we don't agree on what the middle class is?  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 08/15/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here