On TechRepublic: Why Android beats iPhone
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

March 4th, 2009

Gagging patients from online criticism

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 9:36 am

Categories: Consumer Information, General, Internet, Physician Information

Tags: Patient, Doctor, Consumer Advocate, DrScore, Center For Peer Review Justice, Marketing Research, Web 2.0, Marketing, Internet, Dana Blankenhorn

As part of a broader service aimed at protecting doctors from malpractice judgements, a 9-year outfit called Medical Justice is pushing a gag order doctors can make patients sign which keeps them from criticizing the docs online.

This has been going on for years, but an AP story has suddenly made it controversial.

Jeffrey Segal (right), the Greensboro, NC entrepreneur behind the site, insisted to reporters he doesn’t hate sites like Angie’s List and RateMDs, but says they’re not regulated and can do doctors great harm.

Advocates of getting doctors online are aghast. MyDocHub calls it an attack on First Amendment rights, while ePatients.Net calls it an “almost comical attempt to hold back the tide.”calls the whole thing repulsive.

CORRECTION: It was RateMDs that called it repulsive, and ePatients was quoting that in the headline.

Consumer advocates are also grumbling.

On its blog Medical Justice says it is looking to sites “such as” Drscore.com to create a “scientifically validated survey methodology” it can support. It claims to endorse the idea of getting doctors online.

DrScore offers a list of doctors, and asks visitors to take a survey on theirs, using numbers from 0-10 and a variety of metrics. But it does not yet have a statistically-significant sample on many physicians.

By contrast sites like RateMDs allow anonymous comments that can turn one unhappy visit into an online jihad. (Here’s an example.)

Segal’s stance is aggressive, and my guess is that the agreement he is pushing would be laughed out of court, but he’s not alone in feeling a threat from Web 2.0 sites.

The Center for Peer Review Justice is organizing physicians to “spotlight sham medical peer review” and keep online ranters from destroying doctors’ reputations.

So is Dr. Segal right?

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist since 1978, and has covered technology since 1982. He launched the Interactive Age Daily, the first daily coverage of the Internet to launch with a magazine, in September 1994. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to ZDNet Healthcare via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 30 Talkback(s)
RE: Gagging patients from online criticism
I think that doctors should start taking more time with their patients. They need to listen to what they have to say and what is going on with them. I think they need to not just get them in the roo... (Read the rest)
Posted by: anadrol online Posted on: 11/03/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
The empowered patient's perspective  e-Patient Dave | 03/04/09
LOL, i see that  Been_Done_Before | 03/04/09
Sorry, I quoted the headline  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 03/04/09
Upon Further Review  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 03/04/09
Its called we have money and knowledge they dont.  Been_Done_Before | 03/04/09
I should also add, this a very very touchy subject with doctors.  Been_Done_Before | 03/04/09
Wait until they get comparative effectiveness  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 03/04/09
That's happening now with hospitals in Boston  e-Patient Dave | 03/04/09
No - it isn't  emanon2009 | 03/05/09
Reputation  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 03/04/09
Defamation  fnpkathy | 03/05/09
RE: Gagging patients from online criticism  Loverock Davidson | 03/04/09
Doctors are only touchy when ....  kd5auq | 03/04/09
RE: Gagging patients from online criticism  carlvincent | 03/04/09
RE: Gagging patients from online criticism  djmik | 03/04/09
RE: Gagging patients from online criticism  nocroman@... | 03/04/09
Some of the challenges  Ken_z | 03/04/09
Online reviews often miss the mark  emanon2009 | 03/05/09
"often miss the mark" "rarely helpful"  e-Patient Dave | 03/09/09
RE: Gagging patients from online criticism  roystuart@... | 03/05/09
Only the experts can determine quality of care  3dguru | 03/07/09
RE: Gagging patients from online criticism  JuliaSchopick | 03/10/09
RE: Gagging patients from online criticism  Steve_Feldman | 03/19/09
RE: Gagging patients from online criticism  SpectreWriter | 07/07/09
RE: Gagging patients from online criticism  michaeldunage007 | 07/23/09
RE: Gagging patients from online criticism  juicerx | 07/26/09
RE: Gagging patients from online criticism  co13 | 08/07/09
RE: Gagging patients from online criticism  Legal Steroid | 09/23/09
RE: Gagging patients from online criticism  buy steroid | 10/09/09
RE: Gagging patients from online criticism  anadrol online | 11/03/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here