On CHOW: Groundbreaking hangover cure
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

September 14th, 2007

Today's Debate: Cut medical spending in half?

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 6:11 am

Categories: Finance, General, Government, U.S.

Tags: Health Care, Hanson, Dana Blankenhorn

Robin Hanson George Mason economistWriting in the libertarian journal Cato Unbound, George Mason economics professor Robin Hanson claims our national medical budget can be cut in half with no ill effects on health.

Hanson writes that longer lifespans are based on lifestyle choices – drinking, smoking, exercise — rather than medical advances.

Health policy experts know that we see at best only weak aggregate relations between health and medicine, in contrast to apparently strong aggregate relations between health and many other factors, such as exercise, diet, sleep, smoking, pollution, climate, and social status. Cutting half of medical spending would seem to cost little in health, and yet would free up vast resources for other health and utility gains. To their shame, health experts have not said this loudly and clearly enough.

While Hanson cites only a small scale U.S. RAND Corp. experiment to back this claim, which is described in the book Free for All, there is evidence for it in aggregate health statistics. People in Cuba, which emphasizes preventive care and good health habits, live about as long as those in America, for instance.

Had Hanson used this tidbit in his argument, however, he would have run afoul of Cato’s ideological biases.

Separating national health policy from national medical policy, and emphasizing spending on the former over the latter, seems like sound economics. But I refuse to believe that all the money we spend preventing heart disease and stroke with medicine is wasted. Or that clean living alone will extend the lifespan gains of the last century.

Still, Hanson’s study is an important contribution to the debate. Should we be de-emphasizing medical care and expanding our health care efforts? And how can we do that if Americans prefer being couch or mouse potatoes?

What would happen if we cut U.S. medical spending in half?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist since 1978, and has covered technology since 1982. He launched the Interactive Age Daily, the first daily coverage of the Internet to launch with a magazine, in September 1994. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to ZDNet Healthcare via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 3 Talkback(s)
Pick your poison
Would you take it away from him?

It's a case of pick your poison. Right now, half of all medical care expenses are for terminal care. Old people have money and vote; children do neithe... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Yagotta B. Kidding Posted on: 09/14/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
You didn't ask which half  Yagotta B. Kidding | 09/14/07
Quality of Life is important  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 09/14/07
Pick your poison  Yagotta B. Kidding | 09/14/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More