On MovieTome: Top Ten: Most Bizarre Twilight Merch
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

March 10th, 2008

Time to out drug test reviewers?

Posted by Dana Blankenhorn @ 6:32 am

Categories: Ethics, General, Research

Tags: Pfizer Inc., Fact, Anonymity, Reviewers, Business Ethics, Leadership, Management, Dana Blankenhorn

Donald Kennedy, outgoing editor, Science MagazinePfizer is suing the New England Journal of Medicine, aiming to learn the names of anonymous reviewers who conducted peer reviews on its pain relief drug Celebrex.

Donald Kennedy, outgoing editor of Science Magazine (right), says this is a direct threat to all science.

Anonymity is essential to getting honest opinions, he writes, and revealing the names would put those reviewers under political and economic pressure.

Pfizer insists this is no big deal. Subpoenas go out all the time. But is it?

Fact is peer reviewers often out themselves, as Kennedy admitted at an ethics panel last month, telling reporters they peer reviewed papers and what their opinions were.

He also admitted at the conference sponsored by his publisher, the AAAS, that the status of confidentiality agreements involved in peer review has not been determined to exist by the legal system.

The protection of anonymous reviews may in the end become subject to the same balancing test as online anonymity. What we’ve learned in this case is defamatory statements are not protected.

In this case Pfizer is asking for notes which might prove the question one way or another. It’s possible a court might allow an examination of the notes, with the names excised, in order to determine whether defamation has occurred.

At the same time as reviewers’ anonymity is under threat, of course, Nature has decided not to re-institute double-blind peer review, in which reviewers don’t know the names on the papers they’re reviewing, just as authors don’t know reviewers.

Reviewers are the referees in terms of what gets published, and in what form. If the refs become subject to business pressure, does science continue on its way, or is it compromised?

Dana BlankenhornDana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist since 1978, and has covered technology since 1982. He launched the Interactive Age Daily, the first daily coverage of the Internet to launch with a magazine, in September 1994. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Email Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe to ZDNet Healthcare via Email alerts or RSS.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 3 Talkback(s)
RE: Time to out drug test reviewers?
Often peer reviewing is hardly double blind. Research has gotten so specialized, there are sometimes only a few people around the world interested in a topic. In those cases, the only qualified peer r... (Read the rest)
Posted by: gtg781w Posted on: 03/14/08 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Re anonymous reviewers  Rick_R | 03/10/08
RE: Time to out drug test reviewers?  DanaBlankenhornZDNet Moderator | 03/10/08
RE: Time to out drug test reviewers?  gtg781w | 03/14/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Recent Entries

advertisement

Archives

Favorite Links

ZDNet Blogs

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More